LoaderSave StorySave this storyCommentLoaderSave StorySave this storyBy any metric, the horror film Obsession has been one of the most extraordinary Hollywood success stories of 2026.
Made on a budget of around $750,000 and released in May, it went on to earn $488 million worldwide, catapulting 26-year-old director and screenwriter Curry Barker—originally known for his YouTube sketch comedy—to the top of the industry’s “it” list.
So why, you might ask, are people creating a stink over Universal Studios, the international distributor of Obsession, adding its lead female character, Nikki, to the cast of the Halloween Horror Nights event at its Hollywood theme park? Even though the actor who plays her seems very much on board? To answer that, one has to review three months of fierce and enduring debate.
Since the movie hit theaters, fans and critics have been at odds over a thorny question: Who is the victim in Obsession? The plot concerns an awkward, painfully insecure young man, Bear (Michael Johnston), who yearns to be in a romantic relationship with his friend, the seemingly unattainable Nikki (Inde Navarrette). In a moment of frustration, he snaps something called a “One Wish Willow”—believing it to be a whimsical and harmless novelty gift—and voices his desire that she love him more than anyone else in the world.
From that moment forward, Nikki is an unnatural version of herself, moving as if controlled by another consciousness. Her need to be with Bear around the clock is marked by increasingly alarming performances of total devotion that finally escalate to murder. Bear recognizes almost right away that something is wrong but cannot resist acting out his fantasy with the helpless and brainwashed woman who has taken to his bed.
As a consequence, there’s been a lot of hand-wringing as to whether viewers understood that Nikki was not the true villain or monster of the story, regardless of the acts she was cursed to commit. “Nikki was the victim and only Nikki,” insisted one representative X user in a viral post in June, adding that it would be “delusional” to apply the same label to Bear.
Whether anyone did try to defend Bear (as, for example, a guy who had no idea he was casting a real magic spell) seemed beside the point. Commentators wanted to hammer home that Nikki was robbed of her autonomy and that she was effectively raped due to her inability to consent to sex. Again and again, they invoked some theoretical viewer who saw her as the monster in the situation, decrying this reading of the film.
Then, on Monday, Universal Studios Hollywood officially announced that an actor portraying Nikki would haunt the park during its upcoming Halloween Horror Nights, which will run from late September 3 to November 1 and will also feature attractions like a haunted house based on Sinners. Mentioning the addition of Nikki to the event in a press release, Universal teased that “guests may find themselves face-to-face with the latest victim of the One Wish Willow’s terrifying curse,” apparently agreeing with the consensus that the character is at the mercy of a paranormal force rather than intentionally malicious.
It didn’t matter. X users called it a “catastrophically bad idea,” said it was in poor taste to portray “a victim of sexual assault” as a frightening figure, and worried about the actor’s safety as they interacted with park guests. A few argued that it should be Bear wandering the park, overlooking the problem that the character has no distinguishing visual shorthand, whereas Nikki, as in the climax of the film, will be “all bloody,” with tattoos scribbled on her body, according to John Murdy, the creative director and executive producer of Halloween Horror Nights.
Others pushed back on the outrage, noting that many horror legends were molded by abuse; Regan from The Exorcist, a female character Universal has previously included in their seasonal programming, likewise suffers from a form of possession. WIRED contributor John Semley observed that the nuances of scary stories are typically lost in the cheap thrills of an immersive Halloween experience, writing, “You don't go to a haunted house to see the mob who persecuted Frankenstein(’s monster) for being different.”
These colliding arguments eventually turned into disagreements about the very nature of horror fiction.
Gretchen Felker-Martin, an acclaimed horror author whose novels include Manhunt, Cuckoo, and Black Flame, tells WIRED that the heated discourse is an outgrowth of the genre’s function. “Horror movies are about our cultural anxieties,” she says. In the case of Obsession, she explains, these anxieties are “the vulnerability it takes to form genuine human connections, which Bear magically circumvents with disastrous results,” and “fear of women's agency, which Bear's wish destroys in Nikki.”
“Horror asks us to sit with this,” Felker-Martin says, because it will “get a physical and emotional response from us, which is horror's goal as a genre.” In her view, the strong reactions to Obsession “stem from the fact that women's agency is brutally curtailed right now in virtually every sector of American life,” leading audiences to identify with Nikki and dread a similar fate. “I don't know that having an actress walk around a Halloween party impersonating Inde Navarrette's performance is any worse than the basic fact of the existence of theme parks, which flatten complex art into prepackaged commercial entertainment, but I understand why people are angry about it,” Felker-Martin adds. “They don't want to see a frank representation of their pain trivialized.”
For Universal Studios, though, the calculus is clear: Obsession was a massive hit—the highest-grossing original horror film of this century. When Murdy revealed on Sunday at the Midsummer Scream horror convention that Nikki would be a part of the festivities as a roaming scare actor, he noted what a late decision it had been and how much overtime work had gone into organizing the logistics, making it sound as if Universal couldn’t pass up an unexpected opportunity to bring the blockbuster to life. (Universal Studios’ parks and destinations department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.)
Murdy unveiled the Obsession title card to raucous and elated screaming from that crowd, who were only disappointed when he declined to offer explicit details about what Nikki will get up to in the park. “Nikki is out there somewhere,” he offered, vaguely. “You need to get into a Where’s Waldo?–type mentality. She might be looking for her next obsession. And I’ll leave it at that.”
One person who has no qualms about this is Navarrette. Amid the online furor that followed, Cosmopolitan resurfaced comments from the actor about the idea of Nikki at Halloween Horror Nights. In a June interview with the magazine, she said it was her “dream” and that she would love to reprise her now iconic role in the park. “That would be so much fun!” she said. Good luck convincing the true obsessives.
